psyground

Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS)

Twenty statements about doubting your competence or deservingness despite evidence of achievement.

Method and research sources

What CIPS measures

CIPS measures impostor experiences such as fear of being exposed as less capable, attributing success to luck or error, discounting praise, and doubting whether success can be repeated.

How scoring works

Each response is scored from 1 to 5 and all 20 are summed to 20–100. The four published interpretation bands are ≤40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100.

Method and sources

The original instrument, psychometric validation, and systematic review are listed below.

  1. Original publication1985
  2. Validation study
    Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale

    Sabine M. Chrisman, William A. Pieper, Pauline R. Clance, Carol L. Holland, Cheryl Glickauf-Hughes

    1995
  3. Scientific review
    Prevalence, Predictors, and Treatment of Impostor Syndrome: a Systematic Review

    Dena M. Bravata, Sharon A. Watts, Autumn L. Keefer, et al.

    2020

Resources are linked by self-doubt, self-esteem, work, and burnout—not by a diagnosis.

Questions about CIPS

Is impostor syndrome a diagnosis?

No. It describes a pattern of thoughts and feelings and is not a formal psychiatric diagnosis.

Can confident people score high?

Yes. Someone may appear confident or perform well while privately discounting success or fearing exposure.

Does the score prove the problem is inside me?

No. Exclusion, bias, unclear expectations, unstable work, and poor feedback can produce or intensify these experiences.